Adlerian psychology, explained plainly
Adlerian psychology is better known through its phrases than under its name. The "inferiority complex" comes from it. So does the idea that birth order within a family matters. And most of the content of The Courage to Be Disliked comes straight from it. Here are the concepts, in an order that makes them usable.
Who Alfred Adler was
Alfred Adler (1870-1937) was a Viennese physician. He practised general medicine first, which put him early and often in contact with ordinary patients in their trades and their families — a social grounding his psychology never lost. He belonged to the circle that formed around Freud from 1902 and chaired its Viennese society, but their disagreements proved irreconcilable. In 1911 Adler left the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society with a group of colleagues and founded his own school, which he would call individual psychology.
The word individual is misleading. It does not mean "focused on the isolated individual" but indivisible: Adler refused to carve the person into agencies at war with one another. For him a human being thinks, feels and acts in a single movement, in a coherent direction — even when that coherence escapes them.
Inferiority feeling and inferiority complex
Adler starts from something banal: a human being begins life small, dependent and unable. The gap between what you are and what you would like to manage produces a feeling of inferiority, and that feeling is a normal engine. It is what drives a child to walk, to read, to do better than yesterday. An entire civilisation can be read as a response to insufficiencies.
The trouble is not the feeling but its immobilisation. An inferiority complex appears when the feeling stops being an impulse and becomes an argument: I cannot, therefore I will not try. Adler also described its reverse, the superiority complex — the display, the boast, the pose — which is not the opposite of the first but its compensation. Both stand on the same belief: that human worth arranges itself on a ladder.
Teleology: look at the goal, not the cause
This is the most characteristic reversal. Where we usually ask why — what past cause produced this behaviour — Adler asks what for: what goal does this behaviour serve now.
The classic example is anger. Causally, you are overwhelmed by an emotion larger than you. Teleologically, you notice something else: the anger stops dead when the phone rings, it is aimed at a particular person, and it obtains something — silence, compliance, an interrupted conversation. It is therefore, at least in part, a tool.
The reversal is not a moral judgement and does not claim that people are faking. It makes a practical bet: the cause belongs to the past and cannot be changed, whereas the goal belongs to the present and can be pursued by other means. It is also the most criticised part of the school, because it is easy to distort into "you chose to suffer", which is not what Adler said.
Style of life
Adler used style of life for the singular, coherent way a person settled three questions very early: what the world is, what they are in it, and what they must do to have a place. This is not an innate character but a conclusion drawn from a childhood — an interpretation, formed with a child's means, and rarely revised afterwards.
The implication matters: what was concluded can be reconsidered. It takes time and a strong enough reason, but nothing is locked by nature. This is the frame in which Adler took an interest in the family constellation and in birth order — not as a destiny, but as a starting situation from which a child drew conclusions.
Community feeling
Gemeinschaftsgefühl, usually translated as community feeling or social interest, is Adler's criterion of psychological health: the sense of belonging to something larger than yourself and of contributing to it. It is neither devotion nor sacrifice, but cooperation — treating other people as comrades rather than as competitors.
Adler tied this to the three life tasks: work, friendship and love. Each one is a task of relationship, and psychological difficulty almost always shows up in one of them — hence the practical habit of asking which task is being avoided.
Horizontal relationships and encouragement
A practice follows from these premises. A vertical relationship sorts people into superior and inferior, and that includes relationships that look kind: praising someone assumes you are in a position to evaluate them. A horizontal relationship recognises people as different and equal in worth.
That is the point of encouragement, a notion developed above all by Rudolf Dreikurs, the psychiatrist and student of Adler who carried this school into education. Praise points at the result and at the person awarding it — "well done, that's excellent". Encouragement points at the effort, the observed fact, the contribution — "you kept it up three days running", "what you did helped me". The first creates dependence on the evaluator; the second hands the person back the measure of their own movement.
How Adlair puts this into practice
Adlair is an app built on these principles, and the first thing it takes from them is a set of refusals: no score, no leaderboard, no comparison between users. Each of the three would re-establish a vertical relationship between the app and you.
- One to three life spheres, and for each a micro-action that fits into under five minutes — the size that survives a day without motivation.
- A daily mark in three states: done, tried, "I forgive myself". All three move the line forward, because a missed day is information, not a fall.
- A journal with kind, optional prompts, pointed at the fact and the goal rather than at the fault.
- A progress screen showing consistency, average mood, the balance between spheres and badges — all of them internal measures.
- Alfred, an Adlerian-inspired conversational coach, available on Premium with a seven-day free trial. Encrypted data stays on the device.
An app obviously replaces neither a serious reading of Adler nor proper support where that is needed. It does one specific job: keeping a sound idea alive past the evening you understood it. The guide on how to stop comparing yourself to others shows the same mechanism applied to a single concrete case.
What to remember
- Individual psychology means indivisible: a person acts in one movement, towards a goal.
- The feeling of inferiority is an engine; the complex is that engine frozen into an argument.
- Teleology asks what a behaviour is doing for you today rather than where it came from.
- Style of life is a childhood conclusion, and therefore something open to revision.
- The criterion of health is cooperation: horizontal relationships, and encouragement rather than praise.
Frequently asked
What is the difference between Adler and Freud?
Freud looks for the cause of behaviour in the past and in unconscious drive conflicts. Adler looks for the goal the behaviour serves in the present, and places the essentials in our relationships with others rather than in sexuality. They worked together in the Viennese circle until Adler left the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society in 1911.
Which Adlerian psychology books should I start with?
There are two entry points. Adler's own writing, notably What Life Could Mean to You and Understanding Human Nature, presents individual psychology in his own words. For a modern introduction, the Kishimi and Koga dialogue The Courage to Be Disliked lays out the main ideas in plain language — a popularisation, not a primary source.
What are the main criticisms of Adlerian psychology?
Three recur. Its core notions, such as style of life and community feeling, are hard to measure and therefore hard to test. It has been studied in far fewer controlled trials than cognitive behavioural therapy. And its teleological reading of the past, when taken crudely, can appear to minimise genuinely traumatic experience.